The Mad King: How a Nation Normalizes Tyranny

He didn’t rise alone. He was summoned, celebrated, and sold to us as entertainment. Now, we live in the wreckage of that mistake.

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”
— Edmund Burke

The Age of the Mad King

Every generation believes it is immune to tyranny. We comfort ourselves with the belief that our institutions are strong, our people wise, and our democracy eternal. Then comes the Mad King—a figure so absurd, so erratic, and so visibly unfit that no one takes him seriously until it's too late. But the tragedy isn't that such a figure emerges. The real tragedy is how quickly an entire nation learns to live with him.

This is not just a story about Donald Trump, though he is the most glaring modern example. This is about a pattern that repeats throughout history. The Mad King rises not because he is powerful, but because a weakened and confused society hands him the crown. What follows is not just tyranny. It is the slow decay of a civilization's soul.

The Summoning: When Tyranny Becomes a Product

The Mad King does not arrive by coup. He is invited in. First, by a media ecosystem that thrives on outrage and spectacle. In the United States, Trump was a ratings juggernaut. Every outburst, every lie, every crude insult drove clicks, shares, and ad revenue. CNN, Fox News, Facebook, and Twitter built his throne pixel by pixel.

Second, the cultural groundwork is laid by decades of fear and resentment. Economic dislocation, racial panic, and a growing sense of national decline create a ripe environment. The people want strength. They want certainty. They want someone to blame. Enter the Mad King, who offers them the illusion of control through slogans, scapegoats, and swagger.

He is not serious, but he is effective. His madness is not a flaw. It is the feature that makes him untouchable. His followers love that he "says the quiet part out loud." His enemies mock him, but can't look away. And in that distraction, he gathers power.

The Enablers: How Power Brokers Bet on the Fire

Tyrants do not rise alone. They are lifted by those who believe they can control him or benefit from his chaos. The Republican Party in 2016 did not want Trump. But once he became inevitable, they rationalized his behavior. They told themselves they could use him. They'd get tax cuts, conservative judges, and deregulation. They thought they were driving the car. But he ripped the wheel away.

This dynamic is not new. In 1930s Germany, conservative elites backed Hitler because they thought he would crush the communists. In Rome, the Senate believed they could tame emperors like Caligula. History is littered with power brokers who opened the gates, believing they could close them later. They never can.

In America, corporate donors, evangelical leaders, and cable news executives all played their part. They enabled the Mad King because he served their short-term interests. But once you unleash madness, you cannot put it back in the bottle.

Institutional Rot: When the Guardrails Fail

A functioning democracy depends on shared norms, not just laws. When those norms collapse, so do the institutions that rely on them. The Mad King thrives in that collapse. Courts hesitate. Congress deflects. Prosecutors stall. Each claims the next will act. None do.

In the Trump era, the Department of Justice was repeatedly tested. Each time, it flinched. Inspectors general were fired. Whistleblowers were smeared. Congressional subpoenas were ignored. The Supreme Court, stacked with loyalists, looked the other way. Democracy became theater. The rule of law became optional.

This erosion didn’t happen overnight. But it accelerated because so many in power chose caution over courage. They worried about backlash, re-election, or their stock portfolios. They convinced themselves it wasn’t that bad. And in that silence, authoritarianism grew.

The Madness Becomes the Message

Scandals no longer shock. Lies no longer matter. When a society gets used to daily madness, it stops noticing it. The Mad King floods the zone with garbage. He controls the narrative by overwhelming the senses. Journalists try to fact-check him, but there's no time. While they debunk one lie, he's already told five more.

Language itself begins to break down. Words like "treason," "patriot," "fake news," and "witch hunt" lose all meaning. Reality becomes optional. Loyalty to the king becomes the highest virtue. Dissent becomes disloyalty. Criticism becomes enemy action.

This isn’t just about propaganda. It’s about psychological warfare. The Mad King turns truth into mush so he can reshape it. And when people begin to believe nothing, they will believe anything.

The Cowards and the Cheerleaders

Every tyranny needs two kinds of followers: the cowards and the cheerleaders.

The cowards know better. They see the danger, but say nothing. They want to keep their jobs, their status, their access. They roll their eyes in private, then defend him in public. They are the senators, the CEOs, the newspaper editors who decide it’s easier to go along.

The cheerleaders, on the other hand, love the chaos. They don’t want democracy. They want domination. They want their enemies punished and their king adored. They wave the flags, wear the hats, and attack anyone who questions the leader. To them, the Mad King is not a bug in the system. He is the system.

Together, cowards and cheerleaders sustain the regime. Without them, the Mad King is just a showman yelling into the void. With them, he is a god.

The Cost of Pretending It’s Normal

Normalization is the final and most fatal stage. People adjust. They shrug. They say, "That’s just how things are now." The outrage wears off. The protests fade. The news cycle churns. And slowly, dangerously, we begin to accept the unacceptable.

The cost is not only institutional. It is moral. Children in cages. Journalists targeted. Scientists silenced. Citizens tear-gassed. Enemies praised. Allies betrayed. Each act chips away at the idea of who we are—or who we thought we were.

And when that identity collapses, so does the will to resist. The Mad King wins not just by force, but by exhaustion. He turns a free people into spectators of their own decline.

Conclusion: Refusing to Bow

The Mad King is not eternal. No tyrant is. But the damage he does lingers long after he is gone. His legacy is written in judges, in laws, in precedent, in shattered trust. Removing him is not the end. It is the beginning of a long repair.

We must name the danger. We must stop pretending madness is just another political style. We must hold accountable not just the tyrant, but those who enabled him. And most of all, we must never allow ourselves to forget how close we came.

Democracy depends not on perfect leaders, but on people who refuse to kneel. It depends on a public that will not trade freedom for comfort, or truth for loyalty. The Mad King is a test. The next one may be smarter, subtler, and even more dangerous.

We cannot afford to fail again.

---

Further Reading:

• How Democracies Die by Steven Levitsky & Daniel Ziblatt

• Twilight of Democracy by Anne Applebaum

• On Tyranny by Timothy Snyder